Criancas e automaticas

[Jeep]

Bom, teve o caso da menina que matou o instrutor, ai postaram esse garoto de 8 que o coice fez a uzi virar so que dessa vez na direcao da cabeca da crianca:

http://abcnews.go.com/US/father-chri...ry?id=12565132

mas ai levantaram um assunto interessante, pela lei gringa vc pode autorizar seu filho a usar uma arma automatica, mas nao pode deixar ele brincar sem supervisao no parquinho.

http://time.com/3222257/a-tale-of-tw...e-with-an-uzi/

You should be absolutely terrified that a 9-year-old’s constitutional right to fire an Uzi trumps your right to decide at what age your kids can play at the park unsupervised


Parents who allow their 9-year-old to play unsupervised at a playground can be arrested, but handing a nine-year-old an Uzi is perfectly acceptable.


Let’s compare that to a story from earlier this summer, regarding a different 9-year-old, one in South Carolina.

Debra Harrell is a working mother who faces a common problem for parents when school lets out for the summer: finding affordable child care. The McDonald’s employee couldn’t afford to have someone watch her 9-year-old daughter, so the girl was playing on her laptop in the restaurant during her mother’s shifts. However, when that laptop was stolen from their home, Harrell armed her daughter with a cell phone in case of an emergency and let her go unsupervised to an area playground. Another parent noticed the girl there alone and contacted the police, at which point Harrell was arrested and charged with child neglect. If convicted, she faces up to 10 years behind bars.

Is anyone else absolutely scared to death of the horrendous message we’re sending to parents?

Regarding the incident in Arizona, we’re talking about two parents who willingly paid $200 to put a fully automatic weapon in the hands of their 9-year-old daughter. This poor girl, who should’ve been learning to shoot with a .22 rifle or some other weapon she could handle (if indeed she had to learn to fire a gun) was given an Uzi capable of firing up to 600 rounds per minute—creating a recoil difficult for some adults to handle.

And the scariest part? The firing range has a minimum age of eight years old to fire such weapons – one year younger than the girl who is now surely scarred for life. The terrible judgment of the New Jersey parents (combined with the operators of the firing range to allow kids that young to fire Uzis) directly contributed to a man’s death. That stands in stark contrast to Harrell’s troubles in South Carolina.

Instead of a loaded weapon, Harrell armed her daughter with a phone, and sent her to a playground with lots of other kids and adults. The only shooting that took place was the cool water from a splash pad and some hoops on the basketball courts. There were even volunteers who came by the playground with free snacks. While perhaps not ideal since Harrell was at work, she sent her daughter to a family-friendly place with an environment geared toward fun and summertime frivolity. The same kind of place I routinely rode my bike to at the age of nine.

Yet Harrell is the one arrested. Who lost her job. Who spent 17 days in jail, temporarily lost custody of her daughter, and faces 10 years in prison.

So, when considering charges for the neglect of a child, playgrounds seem to be a greater threat in the eyes of the law than guns. And that is a travesty.

Wherever you fall in this country’s ongoing debate about guns and gun control, this should upset you. It should infuriate you. It should alert you to our disturbingly warped gun culture, and should be more than enough proof that change is desperately needed. And parents, let me state this unequivocally: It is never acceptable to let your 9-year-old fire an Uzi. Never. Under any circumstances.

Harrell’s detractors claim someone could’ve kidnapped her daughter at the playground, which is true. But while there is a low risk of child abduction at a public playground in broad daylight, it pales in comparison to the risks involved with letting a 9-year-old fire a machine gun. So please stop referencing the 2nd amendment, because I’m certain our Founding Fathers weren’t contemplating the benefits of letting children fire hundreds of rounds per minute when they drafted the right to bear arms.

If you’re a parent, you should be absolutely terrified that a 9-year-old’s constitutional right to fire an Uzi trumps your right to decide at what age your kids can play at the park unsupervised.

Something has to change. Now.

Aaron Gouveia is a husband, father of two boys, and writes for his site, The Daddy Files.

[EviLBraiN]

Nos EUA tem um lobby mto forte da industria de armamento. Toda vez que alguem fala em mudar algo na legislação para reduzir ou dificultar o acesso a armas logo aparece um monte de opinião contra. E não digo que são contras sem fundamento, muitas vezes eu mesmo concordo.

Mas realmente, liberar para usar armas com 8 anos é demais...

Tinha que subir essa idade e também dar umas restringidas no calibre e tipo de arma. Cano longo preferencialmente pra quem ta começando... etc...

[Hades]

não tive tempo para ler o texto todo, mas se alguém souber responder, fica a dúvida:

- "incidentes" envolvendo crianças e armas são comuns nos EUA ou são fatos isolados?!

[SyncMaster]

Cara... acho desnecessário uma criança aprender a manejar uma arma.

Na minha irrelevante opinião a legislação nos EUA (alguns estados) deve ser modificada para permitir treinamento somente depois dos 16 anos e olhe lá... acho q deveria mudar também no sentido de obrigar proprietários de armas a terem pequenos cofres em casa.

Acho...

[kaue]

La funciona parecido como aqui no brasil

a industria financia os politicos q por sua vez abre as pernas pras industrias explorarem
Nos eua principalmente com material bélico.. país da guerra